Trans Canada Pipeline wants to put $7B of capital to work. Build a pipeline from Hardisty to Houston.
Is that the best use of the capital? From what I've read, the pipe line will end a distribution blockage at Cushing, Oklahoma, in the short-term. In the mid-term, it will create over capacity, in the pipeline system. That will be taken up over time by more production, in Alberta. And elsewhere, if the price of oil stays high. That's a reasonable Except, oil use for gasoline, in the US is declining. High prices are a contributing factor.
So if that was your $7B, some of it is. Your pension fund is likely vested in Trans Canada, would up make that bet?
So what if, love the what if game, Keystone isn't built. What then? Alberta Energy Minister, Ron Liepert, might need resuscitation. He's has quite the gift for influencing people . By the time the Keystone XL decision is made, Alberta will have a new premier. Perhaps a new government. Who knows who will be running the provincial energy department in January 2012.
With no KeystoneXL, oilsands oil gets to market, as it does now. Though major players including ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Cenovus Energy Inc., Valero Energy Corp., Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., won't be too pleased.
We take a 20$/b haircut on the raw stalk because of the glut in Cushing and decreasing American demand. That's $45M a day!
"There is enough spare pipeline capacity in markets outside the U.S. Gulf Coast and Canada’s West Coast to absorb oil sands growth, until near the end of the decade, but new capacity would have to be available after that" Greg Stringham, vice-president, oil sands and markets at the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.
Without Keystone XL, the pace of the oilsands development slows. Is that bad? Would it be 'better' if there was time to create extraction efficiencies. Eighty percent of the resource is too deep for mining. SAGD needs to be better than it is now.
With more time can the industry walk its' efficiency talk. Be more efficient? Live its' social licence to operate. Use less water, less natural ga in the SAGD process. Well, use less of everything. Doesn't that drive costs down? Create better balance sheets?
Does no Keystone XL make local upgrading economic? Right now, apparently it isn't . The existing upgrader capacity is cheaper to run, than building a new green field operations. Wonder why it was such a good idea to build locally, a few years back, and now not so much? Perhaps we need to look beyond just the business economics and look at some social ones, as well.
Like long-term community prosperity tied to resource extraction. Not just dig it .Extract it. Ship it. We aren't going to replace that oil. We can mitigate the extraction by creating some long-term community value, not just hedge fund and CEO bonus value. Norway seems to have captured some. We have a deficit. Norwegians have $500B in the bank!
Now my understanding is, the industry doesn't like Alberta's Bitumen in Kind program. Distorts the market the industry says. The proposed North-West Refinery gets a deal on the bitumen. Gee this guys don't like royalties. Don't like BRIK. Not much long-term community prosperity, in those positions.
If, still playing the what if game, if there is no Keystone XL, then up-grading locally may-be economic. Up-grade here, use existing pipelines. Ship to refineries that can take the upgraded stock. Not all refineries are bitumen able. And there are no plans, anywhere, to increase refinery capacity.
Except may-be right here, in Alberta's Industrial Heartland. Perhaps, there is value added product we can sell. Like biodiesel for the aviation industry, or the trucking industry. The folks in Ontario seem to think that a good bet. And their stock is coming from forestry waste. Competition coming? Might just be a bit better for the environment too.
So no KeystoneXL won't please Trans Canada Pipeline. However it might just create some options. Long term community value is one of them.
So if you had $7B, are you betting Keystone XL, or betting local, where's the value proposition for you?
Canadian Oil Sands - US Council on Foreign Relations





